Max's Salem's Lot review: new adaptation compresses Stephen King's story but is sustained by its characters and scares

When Stephen King's novels are adapted as feature films, the goal is always compression. Even the longest of King's films (Frank Darabont's 189-minute adaptation of The Green Mile and Mike Flanagan's 180-minute director's cut Doctor Sleep) feature composite characters and gloss over subplots from the source material. As cinematic as the books are, this is a reflection of the author's style: his fiction creates not just lives but worlds.

The way many filmmakers have gotten around this obstacle in the past is by not adapting the books as feature films but as miniseries, and The Salem Lot is a prime example. The novel (which is King’s second published) is not one of the writer’s longer tomes, but it has twice found a more comfortable home with the expanded space available on the small screen: first in director Tobe Hooper’s 1979 adaptation and then again in 2004 with director Mikael Salomon at the helm. A prominent part of the book’s experience is witnessing the vampire infestation creep into the abbreviated town that gives the book its title, and the development as a two-part television series allowed for that.

Source link

Leave a Comment